Sign Up!

Welcome to Surgical Pathology Atlas
Sunday, December 21 2014 @ 10:12 PM UTC

Last uploaded images

Spitz Nevus

Mesenchymal Dysplasia

View Printable Version

CuePath 2.0 released

Well it took over a year and few thousand lines of code but finally happened.

The CuePath 2.0 anatomic pathology LIS finaly released. 

More information at:

Let me know how it works.

View Printable Version

How is that for a research

Ok check this out:

and now this one:

Nice research ...

View Printable Version

Qackademics invade the American Cancer Society

General News



  • Complementary medicine for fatigue and cortisol variability in breast cancer survivors. A randomised trial.

    Shamini Jain PhD1,2,*, Desiree Pavlik BA2, Janet Distefan PhD2, Reverend Rosalyn L.ruyere3, Julia Acer MBA2, Rosalie Garcia BA2, Ian Coulter PhD4, John Ives PhD1, Scott C. Roesch PhD4,Wayne Jonas MD1,Paul J. Mills PhD
    [LINK to Article]

    The question is since when the American Cancer Society started accepting a quackademics for publication. How did this article passed the peer review?
    I would also want to know the names of the reviewers who have accepted this article for publication.
    Allow me to clarify.
    My daughter is 6 year old and she already lost few teeth. The question she asked was if the Tooth Fairy will give more money if she wraps the tooth in foil so its shiny.
    Well we can design study about this a randomized double blind by having many kids at the same age half of which will use foil the other half paper. Who knows may be we will be able to even learn something about it. The main problem however is to prove that the Tooth Fairy exists.
    I have to admit I started reading the article and quit after I saw the following paragraph:
    " The purpose of this study is to examine within a blinded randomized controlled trial design whether a biofield therapy (hands-on-healing) would significantly reduce fatigue.."
    Well how about the Tooth Fairy... obviously the "researchers" have accepted the "fact" that bioenery does exists and can "heal" or "affect" human physiology. Really?  The authors list 42 reference none dialing with the effectiveness of the mumbo-jumbo quackery. Did the authors control for placebo; yes by "mock healing". Why didn’t they include other forms of healing like , hand shake, pat on the back, frequent smiling..etc. How would you evaluate the effects providing that fatigue is subjective, waxes and wanes and cortisol variability is diurnal? All of this is the typical example of quackademics and by publishing this bullshit Cancer have lost all credibility.


Google ads

First | Previous | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 | Next | Last

Google Links

Support the site by clicking on a link. If you are using AdBlock Plus please add site filter to allow Google AdSense:


My Account

Sign up as a New User
Lost your password?


There are no upcoming events

Older Stories

Friday 03-Jun

Friday 03-Dec

Tuesday 26-Jan



Which of the following will result in NO livor mortis ?

  •  Drowning in fast flow river
  •  Drowning in a well
  •  Drowning in salty watter
  •  Drowning in non-salty watter
  •  None of the above
  •  All of the above
This poll has 0 more questions.
Other polls | 301 votes | 1 comments
Poll Topic: High Risk HPV

Question: E6 protein of the oncogenic HPV will induce premature degradation of:

  •  p16
  •  p27
  •  p53
  •  pRB
  •  p107
This poll has 1 more questions.
Other polls | 226 votes | 0 comments
Apoptosis inhibitors

1/1: Which one of the following inhibits apoptosis.

BCL-2 93.10%
BCL-10 0.00%
BCL-6 0.00%
BCL-1 0.00%
BCL-xL 6.90%

Who\'s Online

Guest Users: 73


0 Pages Viewed
0 Unique Visits

New Users
New Users: 4